Poor turnout for survey on council changes
By Karenh2009 | Sunday, September 12, 2010, 11:25
A borough-wide survey asking residents for their opinions on how the council
involves the community in decision making has received a disappointing number of
responses.
Over the summer Wigan Council announced that it was embarking on a review of
the way the council makes decisions affecting communities across the borough in
a bid to explore the possibility of alternative arrangements that would enable
people to get more involved.
Known as the Community Governance Review, the exercise was prompted in part
by calls for town councils to be created in a number of communities across the
borough.
The council used the opportunity to expand the scope of the review and ask
residents, businesses, community groups, voluntary organisations and others for
their views on the present arrangements and what they might like to see in the
future.
A leaflet containing a questions and comments section was sent to every
household in the borough, approximately 140,000, with the council’s residents’
magazine Borough Life.
Residents were also signposted to the leaflet through an article in the
magazine itself.
Questions asked included what residents thought of the arrangements as they
stand and whether they would like to see a parish or town council to cover their
area. The results of the survey saw just 783 responses received by the council,
32 of which were spoilt – this accounts for less than 0.6 per cent of the
population of the borough.
Residents were given the opportunity to fill in and return the form or
complete it on-line via the council’s website. Of this number, 108 were filled
in on-line.
At the full Council meeting on Wednesday 8th September Members debated the
results of the review and concluded that in view of the limited response no
further action should be taken at this time to pursue the review further.
Members debated the reasons for the limited response which it was considered
could range from lack of a demand for a change through to a failure by the
consultation process to engage residents sufficiently.
Borough Solicitor Kevin Lawson says: “In looking at whether or not residents
wanted to have a parish or town council in their area, the results show an
overall response of 381 in favour and 379 against. While this varied from ward
to ward the response level did not reflect the numbers of signatures in
petitions that had been handed in.
“Following this initial consultation it was anticipated that a further, more
detailed survey could be issued to residents in areas where there was a clear
demand for a change but the Council considered that there was at this time no
clear evidence of such a desire for change.”
Comments
A poor response.
You’ve got to hand it to the powers that be in Wigan Council. They certainly seem to know how to engineer a minimal response to one of their questionnaires. Announcements & publicity that the review was about to take place were virtually nil. It’s title ‘Wigan’s Comm...unities Governance Review’ which I do realise is probably the proper one is enough to make ones’ eyes glaze over & coupled with it being delivered with the less than popular Borough Life magazine, I suspect more than encouraged it to head straight for the bin in most households, that’s if it got to their address in the first place. The woolly title ‘Governance Review’ in my opinion fails to grab the attention & convey its massive importance for the future. Are you happy with the way your Council’s run at the moment? Or would you prefer a more localised Council? I myself have always been concerned with the lack of local knowledge & little displayed interest by Wigan based Council staff in this eastern section of the borough. For example if you mention King St, Leigh Bridge or Silk Street in Leigh. You will probably be asked, where’s that? If they are ruling over the whole borough they should show more interest in this side of it. I do honestly feel that the people living in this side of the borough do live under a noticeable disadvantage which is a great shame & does great harm.
By DAVID_HULL at 16:13 on 14/09/10
Report